If you are going to impact the pve game with pvp changes, then you are going to get comments from pvers arguing against changes.
If you don't want pve imput on your pvp forums, then don't bring up nerfing pve gear in pve situations.
And I think unchained minis are a great idea to let new players get into minis without being farmed by high level pvpers.
I reserve the right to post on any thread that impacts how I play the game regardless of what others think.
And, yes, I do own a yorkie so I'm used to arguments.
Gods sake, having 3+ year of play time does not mean = good player
its simple because of experience.
With more experience the advice funcom can receive will be far better than the player who played 2-3 month and asking changes.
Also this eliminates players who post that sin needs a buff...
- Httassadar 80 pvp 7 tos tyranny
- Fatherbinder 80 pvp 7 pom tyranny
No it doesn't, because the people who cried for the 2.0 ranger revamp were all people playing since release...
Players who can't win on their ability always cry for class changes for generic advantages, if they play for 3 months or 3 years won't change that. Most of the players who were bad 3 years ago are still bad today.
Doomsayer 2008
I guess you didnt like my post in the sin thread. But compared to me and your requirements your a such a nub. I have all 12 classes, 1 pvp 10 mainly without bori, 7-8 chars over pvp 5 without any bori and way over 65k kills, thousands of mini games played and over 100 sieges. Play since beta. You requirements are invalid, i have more expirience then you but still another opinion about sins then you do.
Retired nab.. once it was Korando (PvP 10 BS), Andromaeda (PvP 10 Sin), Calore (PvP 10 Demo) and minions...